Current Projects

Painting by Brandon Morrison, @ibletstudio
Europa and the Bull
Plans to Save Europe from War, 1923-1939
Europa and the Bull places readers inside three international organizations that aimed to reshape the social and political landscape of Europe after the First World War: the Pan-European Union (PEU), the New Europe Group (NEG), and the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF). Of particular interest is how these groups and their members promoted plans for a continental federal government in Europe. This book explores why they thought federating Europe was desirable and what impact they imagined this would have on average individuals’ quality of life.
​
As readers learn about the hopes and aspirations of the people in these three fascinating groups, they will find a very different portrayal of interwar federalists than what's typically presented by historians. Europa and the Bull challenges a pervasive belief that federalists between the wars were a small group of intellectual men. This study demonstrates a significant proportion of European integration advocates were women, particularly feminists. Equally illuminating, these groups demonstrate that many federalists gendered their plans for a European polity by prioritizing the “feminine” qualities they thought a new federal system of governance required. Many of them blamed the sense of crisis and chaos between the wars on the idea that the nation-state system was man-made. They believed women represented an alternative source of leadership and had a stronger propensity for cooperation; thus, unification advocates prioritized the role of women in creating a federal government in Europe.
​
This book will be of interest to experts, students, and educated readers alike. Although the activism and ideas in this investigation came from people living in the 1920s, the concerns they expressed about political polarization, social and economic justice, women's rights, and the importance of combatting xenophobia in a global society will equally speak to many of us living in the 2020s.
​
​
​
​
WILPF, Minority Conflict, & Ukrainian Refugees in Prague, 1928-1937
International Disorder
My newest project stems from a unique and exciting honor to serve as a visiting scholar at the University of Hradec Králové in the Czech Republic during the Fall (Winter) 2022 semester. While originally researching Czech peace organizations' attitudes toward European federation, once in the archives, I was struck by the focus interwar Czech pacifists devoted to the rights and protection of Eastern European minorities. One of their greatest concerns was for Ukrainians in Poland, many of whom fled to Prague when conflict in Galicia escalated in the late 1920s. Thus, this project is now exploring the relationships between Czech, Ukrainian, and Polish representatives in organizations determined to find peaceful solutions to international conflict. It asks how they worked within the existing domestic and diplomatic government avenues, while also trying to create a "New International Order" out of what they considered dangerous and volatile political systems.
This project is still in its infancy, but thanks to the generous support provided by UHK's Filozofická Faculta Dean's Decree No. 1/2020, I will have the time and resources to devote to this project for the rest of 2022, and will be presenting my findings at workshops, conferences, and invited talks in late 2022 and 2023.
​


The Emotions of (Dis)Integration
HoW Britain Feels About Europe, 1933-Present
Some of the most active European federalists during the 1930s were located in Britain. My fascination with British attitudes toward the continent led to this project, “The Emotions of (Dis)Integration: How Britain Feels About Europe, 1933-Present.” Inspired by the Affective Turn in history and political science, this project investigates how emotions shape the Anglo-European relationship. This investigation bridges the past and the present by analyzing the role of emotions in the desire for integration and disintegration; the emotional impact of union and secession. While analyzing the emotions that first led people to propose European integration in the early twentieth century, I also consider how emotions are again altering people’s perceptions of Europe and the future of European politics on both sides of the channel.
In early Spring 2020, I received a grant to fund this project. However, due to COVID-19 travel restrictions, some of the research has been put on hold, but will resume once it is safe to do so.
​
​
​
​